Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 P.2d 920 - State v. Archambeau

State v. Archambeau’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State v. Johnson (2017), State v. Lopez (1994)

1 district · 43 state decisions

300199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Smith v. Goguen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In construing whether an item, object, or thing not commonly known as a dangerous weapon is a dangerous weapon, the character of the instrument, object, or thing; the character of the wound produced, if any; and the manner in which the instrument, object, or thing was used are determinative.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. C.D.L. · Salt Lake City v. Miles
  2. “any item that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Pugmire · State v. C.D.L.
  3. “(1) items commonly known as dangerous weapons; and (2) items not commonly known as dangerous weapons but included if, in considering the ... enunciated characteristics [in what is now section 76-10-501(6)(b) ], they qualify.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Salt Lake City v. Miles · 2013 UT App 77 - Salt Lake City v. Miles

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.