¶1We conclude that the trial court correctly interpreted the deed restrictions here at issue. See Vetzel v. Brown, 86 So.2d 138 (Fla.1956); Maule Industries, Inc. v. Sheffield Steel Products, Inc., 105 So.2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).
¶2Affirmed.
820 So. 2d 1085
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 17, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-07-17
Relies on Vetzel v. Brown · 105 So. 2d 798 - Maule Industries v. Sheffield Steel Products
Decided 2002-07-17
¶1We conclude that the trial court correctly interpreted the deed restrictions here at issue. See Vetzel v. Brown, 86 So.2d 138 (Fla.1956); Maule Industries, Inc. v. Sheffield Steel Products, Inc., 105 So.2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).
¶2Affirmed.