State v. Gaspard’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 759 So. 2d 126 - State v. Villarreal · State v. Villarreal · 761 So. 2d 791 - State v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is noted that, although the trial court allowed defendant to enter her guilty plea under the provisions of Crosby, she did not challenge any specific adverse ruling by the court. Thus, she did not preserve her right to appeal this issue under Crosby. [7]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.