Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SO2D 1114 - Haley v. Roberts

Haley v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. · Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. · Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. · Greenhouse v. CF KENNER ASSOCIATES LTD.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden of proof remains with the movant. However, if the movant will not bear the burden of proof at trial on the matter that is before the court on the motion for summary judgment, the movant's burden on the motion does not require him to negate all essential elements of the adverse party's claim, action, or defense, but rather to point out to the court that there is an absence of factual support for one or more elements essential to the adverse party's claim, action, or defense. Thereafter, if the adverse party fails to produce factual support sufficient to establish that he will be able to satisfy his evidentiary burden of proof at trial, there is no genuine issue of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “dispositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.