¶1Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that satisfies the. requirements of Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
820 So. 2d 331
Mayo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 30, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-01-30
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2012
5 state decisions
Relies on Hardy v. Douglas
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-01-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →