Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SO2D 37 - Cleveland v. State

Cleveland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Evans v. State · Blue v. State · 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State · 784 So. 2d 884 - King v. State · 603 So. 2d 309 - Wilkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he refusal of a motion for a continuance on the ground of the absence of a witness will not be overturned on a motion for a new trial unless the witness, or his affidavit showing what his testimony would be, is offered on the hearing of the motion, or it is shown that it was impossible or impracticable to secure the attendance of the witness or to secure his affidavit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]ther than the mere assertions made during the trial by counsel for Cleveland regarding Murrell's testimony, there is no substantial proof that what Murrell would have said would have aided Cleveland.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.