Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 So. 2d 405 - Hemphill v. State

820 So. 2d 405 - Hemphill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f Hemphill's offense occurred on or after October 1, 1993, he could have been properly charged under section 794.011, and the statute of limitations would not have run.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he tolling provisions of section 775.15(7) are not applicable to violations of section 794.041 committed before October 1, 1993.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “section 775.15(7) does not and has never included section 794.041 as a statute to which its tolling provisions apply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.