820 So. 2d 758 - Wall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 742 So. 2d 1140 - Daniels v. State · 207 Ga. App. 472 - Humphrey v. State · 767 So. 2d 1065 - Witherspoon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the decision of the trial court on a motion for a new trial, [an appellate court] views all of the evidence in the light most consistent with the jury verdict. A motion for a new trial addresses the weight of the evidence and should only be granted to prevent an unconscionable injustice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dunigan v. State · Gibson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.