Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 So. 2d 89 - Ex Parte Third Generation, Inc.

820 So. 2d 89 - Ex Parte Third Generation, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rochelle v. Rochelle · Hartford Insurance v. Lagano · Lockwood v. Bowles · Henderson v. Planters & M. Bank · 349 So. 2d 564 - Brown v. Kingsberry Mortg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 60(b) requires that a motion for relief from a judgment based on fraud or misconduct of an adverse party be filed within four months of the judgment .... This was a delay of more than four months, and the delay made the motion untimely. We hold that the entry of the [Rule 60(b)] order was an abuse of discretion in that it granted relief on an untimely petition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.