Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 So. 2d 901 - Young v. Moore

820 So. 2d 901 - Young v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weaver v. Graham · Toussie v. United States · Lynce v. Mathis · 689 So. 2d 235 - State v. Leroux · 733 So. 2d 499 - Gomez v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sentences imposed for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995. " Id. The court concluded that the date the defendant committed the last acts "in furtherance of the scheme to defraud . . . should be considered the date the offense was finally consummated or committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 922 So. 2d 297 - Cornett v. State
  2. “`[f]elonies . . . with continuing dates of enterprise shall be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines in effect on the beginning date of the criminal activity.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 922 So. 2d 297 - Cornett v. State
  3. “sentences imposed for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 922 So. 2d 297 - Cornett v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.