¶1Because the defendant’s motion for continuance effected a waiver of his speedy trial rights, see State v. Guzman, 697 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), the application for writ of prohibition is denied.
820 So. 2d 946
Romero v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 10, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-04-10
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2004
1 state decisions
Relies on State v. Guzman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-04-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →