Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SW2D 194 - Barrera v. State

Barrera v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2016

8 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. State · Aguirre v. State · Brown v. State · Blain v. State · Boney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dr. Schorlemmer’s testimony that the wound created a substantial risk of death is sufficient to establish that [the victim] suffered serious bodily injury. See Boney v. State, 572 S.W.2d 529, 532 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). The relevant inquiry, is the extent of the bodily injury as inflicted, not after the effects have been ameliorated or exacerbated by medical treatment. Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572, 575 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Dr. Schorlemmer’s testimony that post-operatively [the victim] was not at risk of death does not render the evidence insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.