Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SW2D 527 - State v. Starks

State v. Starks’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Delaware v. New York · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County · Brower v. United States · Pinkerton v. McCotter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Factors that appellate courts have considered when determining whether the trial court coerced the jury include the amount of time that the jury deliberates before the hammer instruction is read, the amount of time that elapses between the reading of the hammer instruction and the verdict, whether the trial judge knows numerically how the jury is split and the position of the majority, and whether the giving of the instruction conforms with the Notes on Use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.