Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SW2D 821 - Alexander v. State

Alexander v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. State · Studer v. State · Brasfield v. State · Nickerson v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Tex.R.CRIM.Evid. 801(d). Davis did not relate any “statement” by a third-party declarant that was offered for the truth of the matter asserted, but testified only that “discussions ... about robbing [Taylor]” took place. Because the objected-to testimony was not hearsay, we overrule ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.