Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 820 SW2D 831 - Shields v. State

Shields v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Whitsey v. State · Keeton v. State · Tompkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ujnless reflected by the evidence, an appellate court does not judicially ‘know 5 where jurors were seated on the venire, which jurors were peremptorily struck by the parties, jurors’ ethnicity, ages, occupations, styles of dress, religious preferences, or a myriad of other factors which may support or negate a charge that the [opponent] has used its peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. The most elaborately constructed, fact-based argument on appeal is for naught unless it is supported by evidence in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.