Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 A.2d 666 - Antonis v. Liberati

Antonis v. Liberati’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCafferty · 371 Pa. Super. 368 - Storm v. Golden · Commonwealth ex rel. Orris v. Roberts · Prouty v. Marshall · Firestone v. Schmehl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is an easy matter for a mortgagee, or a grantee in each particular instance, either in person, or by a representative, to look at the record, and see that the instrument has been properly entered.... There is every reason why it should be made the duty of the mortgagee to see that his instrument is properly recorded. This will not in any way interfere with the principle that, when the instrument is certified as recorded, it shall import notice of the contents from the time of filing; but that must be understood as in connection with an instrument properly recorded. As said above, the record is notice of just what it contains, no more and no less. The obligation of seeing that the record of an instrument is correct must properly rest upon its holder. If he fails to protect himself, the consequence cannot justly be shifted upon an innocent purchaser.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.