Taylor v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““All grounds for relief available to an applicant at the time he or she commences a [postconviction review] proceeding * * * must be raised in his or her original, or a supplemental or amended, application. Any ground finally adjudicated or not so raised * * * may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds that in the interest of justice the applicant should be permitted to assert such a ground for relief.””

   6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Ferrell v. Wall · Joseph Hall v. State of Rhode Island

2. “baifring] the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding”). The state, however, failed to raise the issue below so we will address the merits of McKinney's argument. • 3 . The crime Ewing committed is considered a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. McKinney v. State

3. “[t]his Court will * * * `review de novo any post-conviction relief decision involving questions of fact or mixed questions of law and fact pertaining to an alleged violation of an applicant's constitutional rights.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Washington v. State