D & H THERAPY ASSOCIATES v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Scarano v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey · Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance · Russell v. Rolfs · Konstantinidis v. C. N. Chen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Courts often inquire whether the party who has taken an inconsistent position had succeeded in persuading a court to accept that party’s earlier position, so that judicial acceptance of an inconsistent position in a later proceeding would create the perception that either the first or the second court was misled.” Id. (quoting D & H Therapy Associates, 821 A.2d at 694 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.