Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 1015 - United States v. Hutson

United States v. Hutson’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 1015 · 1987

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
6
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably United States v. Duncan (1990), United States v. El-Mezain (2011)

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

2401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States · Babich v. United States · Weatherford v. Bursey · Anthony v. United States · Troxler Hosiery Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) 22 the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. 23 And, she says that the Government's foundation did not show such”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[h]er procedural rights may be vindicated by a meaningful retrospective hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If a meaningful hearing can be held, the state also bears the burden of proof on the issue of competency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.