Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 127 - United States v. Fiore

United States v. Fiore’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 127 · 1987

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably State v. Jenks (1991), United States v. Torres (1990)

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

5501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 34 · 18 U.S.C. § 844

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Albernaz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he conviction must be sustained if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonable hypothesis which is consistent with innocence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict; all inferences must be drawn in the [Government's favor; the [Defendant bears a heavy burden; the verdict must be sustained if there is substantial evidence to support it; and ... the conviction must be sustained if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.