Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 1328 - United States v. Tate

United States v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 1328 · 1987

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
7
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably United States v. Lenfesty (1991), United States v. Moore (1992)

29 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

2901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on United States v. Ross · Cooper v. State of California · Colorado v. Bertine · Michigan v. Thomas · Dothard v. Rawlinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[W]here evidence of other crimes is ‘so blended or connected, with the one[s] on trial as that proof of one incidentally involves the other[s]; or explains the circumstances; or tends logically to prove any element of the crime charged,’ it is admissible as an integral part of the immediate context of the crime charged. When the other crimes evidence is so integrated, it is not extrinsic and therefore not governed by Rule 404(b).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so blended or connected with the one on trial as that proof of one incidentally involves the other; or explains the circumstances thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.