Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 272 - Murray v. Ramada Inn, Inc.

Murray v. Ramada Inn, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 272 · 1987

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2012

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · 462 So. 2d 166 - Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Div. of Ervin Industries · 410 So. 2d 1048 - Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. · Aguillard v. Langlois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Does assumption of risk serve as a total bar to recovery by a plaintiff in a negligence case, or does it only result in a reduction of recovery under the Louisiana comparative negligence statute?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A. In any action for damages where a person suffers injury, death, or loss, the degree or percentage of fault of all persons causing or contributing to the injury, death, or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person’s insolvency, ability to pay, immunity by statute, including but not limited to the provisions of R.S. 23:1032, or that the other person's identity is not known or reasonably ascertainable. If a person suffers injury, death, or loss as the result partly of his own negligence and partly as a result of the fault of another person or persons, the amount of damages recoverable shall be reduced in proportion to the degree or percentage of negligence attributable to the person suffering the injury, death, or loss. B. The provisions of Paragraph A shall apply to any claim for recovery of damages for injury, death, or loss asserted under any law or legal doctrine or theory of liability, regardless of the basis of liability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “testimony supports the jury's conclusion that Murray knew, appreciated, and voluntarily exposed himself to the risk of diving into the shallow end of the swimming pool.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.