Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 686 - Perkinson v. Gilbert/Robinson, Inc.

Perkinson v. Gilbert/Robinson, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 686 · 1987

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Buffington v. Baltimore County (1990), City of Richmond Virginia v. Madison Management Group Inc (1990)

19 federal appellate · 11 district ·

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Harrison Richardson v. Thomas E. Gregory · G-K Properties and Genesco, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose and the City of San Jose · Ceco Corp. v. Coleman · Stewart v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “even if the award [which was reduced to $42,085 from the $71,202 requested] overcompensates plaintiff for unnecessary expenses caused by defendant, it could still have been justified for punitive and deterrent purposes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “substantial uncertainty as to whether the documents were lost through inadvertence or because of actions taken in bad faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “waived her right to have the regulations considered by the jury because she failed to put them in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.