United States v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.2d 76 · 1987
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably United States v. Moore (1991), United States v. Johnson (1993)
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Johnston v. Holiday Inns, Inc. · United States v. Barker · United States v. Kobrosky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) Insuring That the Plea is Voluntary. The court shall not accept a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without first, by addressing the defendant personally in open court, determining that the plea is voluntary and not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from a plea agreement. The court shall also inquire as to whether the defendant's willingness to plead guilty or nolo contendere results from prior discussions between the attorney for the government and the defendant or the defendant’s attorney. (e) Plea Agreement Procedure. (2) Notice of Such Agreement. If a plea agreement has been reached by the parties, the court shall, on the record, require the disclosure of the agreement in open court or, on a showing of good cause, in camera, at the time the plea is offered ... (h) Harmless Error. Any variance from the procedures required by this rule which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“disclosure of the government's all-or-nothing negotiating position might well have led the court to investigate further into possible coercion by appellant's codefendants. Further investigation would have produced a fuller record . . . with which to assess the voluntariness of the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While this specific claim [of Rule 11 violation] was not asserted in the motion, the facts about this issue were clearly developed at the hearing on the motion to withdraw the guilty pleas ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.