Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 778 - Doyle v. Brock

Doyle v. Brock’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 778 · 1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Vargas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1991), Ellis v. Chao (2003)

15 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 28 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 482 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Heckler v. Chaney · Rideout v. United States · Dunlop v. Bachowski · Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'n · Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a requirement that has a large antidemocratic effect”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he only way a court can assess the Secretary's actions is to examine his statement of reasons in relation to the evidence before the Secretary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “reasonableness must be gauged in the light of the circumstances of the particular case,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.