Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.2d 963 - Allen v. Bowen

Allen v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.2d 963 · 1987

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
May 2006
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably Jean v. Nelson (1988), Baker v. Bowen (1988)

18 federal appellate · 10 district ·

300198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 504 (Equal Access to Justice Act)

Relies on Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Chipman v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Jackson v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “H.R.Rep. No. 120, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. 20, reprinted in 1985 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 132, 149. Thus, as we concluded in Allen,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “decision not to raise the $75 flat hourly rate was in any way indicative of its desire to reduce the cost of living adjustment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Pub.L. No. 99-80 ... intend[ed] to have the cost of living adjustment to the $75 an hour rate measured from 1981.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.