United States v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.3d 1124 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Pearson v. Callahan · Taylor v. United States · Rita v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as any crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year that: (i) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another; or (ii) is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B) (emphasis added). Courts generally refer to the first clause, § 924(e)(2)(B)(i), as the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution's guarantee of due process,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In interpreting the residual clause, our jurisprudence has been informed by cases interpreting an identical clause in the [ACCA].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.