United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.3d 1194 · 2016
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Williams · Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation · United States v. Torres · United States v. Horn · United States v. Wardell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and ask whether any rational trier of fact could find the element in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The only question is 'whether the government's evidence, credited as true, suffices to establish the elements of the crime.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.