United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.3d 1293 · 2016
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 10 · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Kastigar v. United States · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Colorado v. Spring
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.