United States v. Iguaran’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.3d 1335 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 46 U.S.C. § 70502 · 46 U.S.C. § 70503
Relies on United States v. Cotton · United States v. Irey · Henderson v. Shinseki · Henderson v. Shinseki · Henderson v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the master or individual in charge fails, on request of an officer of the United States ..., to make a claim of nationality or registry for that vessel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“for a district court ... ha[s] adjudicatory authority over a charge that a defendant conspired to violate the substantive crime defined in the [Act]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the conspira[tors'] vessel was, when apprehended, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.