Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.3d 178 - García v. Lynch

García v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.3d 178 · 2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on LOZADA · Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Mark Saakian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Jesus Escobar-Grijalva v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · 24 I. & N. Dec. 56 - O-S-G

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an affidavit explaining the petitioner's agreement with counsel regarding legal representation; (2) evidence that counsel has been informed of the allegations of ineffective assistance and has had an opportunity to respond; and (3) if it is asserted that counsel's handling of the case involved a violation of ethical or legal responsibilities, a complaint against the attorney filed with disciplinary authorities or, in the alternative, an explanation for why such a complaint has not been filed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “arguments not made before the BIA may not make their debut in a petition for judicial review of the BIA's final order”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in favor of a case-by-case assessment of whether the BIA's application of Lozada was arbitrary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.