Tillery v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
821 F.3d 182 · 2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Dia v. Ashcroft · Negusie v. Holder · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a reviewing court is able to provide intelligent review on issues over which it has appellate jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Our task is to review 4 See Brief for Harvard Immigration & Refugee Clinic as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner at 4. - 25 - the agency's legal interpretation, not perform it in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the BIA rest[s] its decision on an alternative basis . . . it is the BIA's opinion that serves as the final agency decision under review before [this court]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.