Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 F.3d 386 - United States v. Murray

United States v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

821 F.3d 386 · 2016

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Matlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review the District Court's denial of a motion to suppress for clear error as to the underlying factual determinations but exercise plenary review over the District Court's application of law to those facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.