Thompson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 18 U.S.C. § 911 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · Edwards v. Arizona · Thomas v. Arn · Rhode Island v. Innis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.