Hicks v. Leake’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Daniels v. Williams · Paul v. Davis · Brower v. County of Inyo · Temkin · Landol-Rivera v. Cruz Cosme
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“specific intent to restrain must be alleged and proven in order to establish a claim for an excessive force violation of the Fourth Amendment”). 21 . As noted above, the Graham Court held that claims ol excessive force arising in the context of arrests or seizures are properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.