Goldsberry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
45 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Weaver v. Graham · Kansas v. Hendricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tlo show that two challenged offenses constitute the same offense under the actual evidence test, "a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable possibility that the evidentiary facts used by the fact-finder to establish the essential elements of one offense may also have been used to establish the essential elements of a second challenged offense."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Osburn v. State · Adcock v. State“The ex post facto clauses prohibit Indiana from enacting a law that `imposes a punishment for an act which was not punishable at the time it was committed; or imposes additional punishment to that then prescribed.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. State · Brown v. State“increases the penalty by which a crime is punishable”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. State · Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.