State v. Rick’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hannuksela · Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud · State v. Colvin · State v. Leathers · LaChapelle v. Mitten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a crime, which may be prosecuted under [Minnesota statutes criminalizing various degrees of murder, assault, and attempts thereof], for a person who knowingly harbors an infectious agent to transfer, if the crime involved: (1) sexual penetration with another person without having first informed the other person that the person has a communicable disease; [or] (2) transfer of blood, sperm, organs, or tissue, except as deemed necessary for medical research or if disclosed on donor screening forms....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rick“the legislature's intent is clear from plain and unambiguous statutory language,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gundy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.