Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 N.W.2d 789 - State v. Milton

State v. Milton’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Texas v. Brown · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Oliver v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mom.” 3 . The passenger side of the two-tone van was facing Fairbanks. 4 . Onyelobi, pointing to cases from our court referencing review of probable cause determinations for clear error, asserts that our standard of review, lacks clarity. We disagree. Our cases establish that when examining a pretrial order on a motion to suppress, we review”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) an error, (2) that was plain, and (3) that affected the defendant's substantial rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]n accomplice liability instruction must explain to the jury that in order to find a defendant guilty as an accomplice, the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew his alleged accomplice was going to commit a crime and the defendant intended his presence or actions to further the commission of that crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.