State v. R.H.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl · State v. Humes · Reed v. State · State v. Ambaye · City of North Oaks v. Sarpal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“13. The County Attorney also argues that [appellant’s] absconding from a charge is relevant in the event he should be charged with a future offense, as it would influence the setting of bail or other security. This is a valid concern. ... Should this record be sealed the information would not be available for a court to consider. [[Image here]] 15. The law enforcement agencies or jurisdictions whose records would be affected have established by clear and convincing evidence that the interests of the public and public safety outweigh the disadvantages to [appellant] of not sealing the record per Minn.Stat. § 609A.03, subd. 5(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.