Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 P.2d 1285 - Engle v. State

Engle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the doctrine of invited error, if a party induces action by a court, the party cannot argue error because the court took such action. Invited errors will not normally be grounds for reversal unless they go beyond a pertinent reply or are necessarily prejudicial. ©”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “by virtue of its inherent power and duty to assure a fair and impartial trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.