821 So. 2d 116 - State ex rel. A.M.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 807 So. 2d 1138 - State ex rel. S.D. · 793 So. 2d 362 - State ex rel. A.H. · State ex rel. Thacker · State ex rel. A.H.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. After adjudication of a misdemeanor-grade delinquent act, the court may: (1) Reprimand and warn the child and release him into the custody of his parents either unconditionally or subject to such terms and conditions as deemed in the best interests of the child and the public. (2) Reprimand and warn the child and release him into the custody of some other suitable person either unconditionally or subject to such terms and conditions as deemed in the best interests of the child and the public. The court shall, whenever practicable, select a person of the same religious faith as the child or his parents. (3) Place the child on probation in the custody of his parents or other suitable person. B. As conditions of probation, if ordered pursuant to Subparagraph A(3) of this Article: (1) The court shall impose all of the following restrictions: (a) Prohibit the child from possessing any drugs or alcohol. (b) Prohibit the child from engaging in any further delinquent or criminal activity. (2) The court may impose any other term and condition deemed in the best interests of the child and the public, including: (a) A requirement that the child attend school, if the school admits the child. (b) A requirement that the child or his parent or legal guardian perform court-approved community service activities. If feasible, the court-approved community service activities shall be conducted by the caretaker and child together. (c) A requirement that the child make reasonable restitution to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.