Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 SO2D 1174 - Pierre v. State

Pierre v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · Mandri v. State · 557 So. 2d 861 - Stein v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A de facto judge functions under color of authority even though that judge's actual authority suffers from some procedural defect . . . A de facto judge's acts are valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An objection to a de facto judge's authority to serve must be timely made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.