Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bajakajian · 570 So. 2d 703 - Newsome v. State · 565 So. 2d 212 - Sea Calm Shipping Co., S.A. v. Cooks · 578 So. 2d 1374 - State v. Smith · 627 So. 2d 960 - Agee v. State Ex Rel. Galanos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““‘In a § 20-2-93, Ala.Code 1975, forfeiture proceeding, the State may establish a prima facie case by showing that the item to be forfeited was used, or intended to be used, in violation of the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Culpepper v. State, 587 So.2d 359 (Ala.Civ.App.1991). The standard of that proof is reasonable satisfaction. Agee v. State ex rel. Galanos, 627 So.2d 960 (Ala.Civ.App.1993)....’””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]here was no evidence indicating that the automobile had been used to transport a controlled substance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`involved in a high-profit business of narcotics sales.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spears v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.