Ortiz v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Meza v. General Battery Corp. · Jenkins v. State · State v. Bargeman · 676 So. 2d 1134 - Fine v. Regional Transit Authority · Jenkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“four prerequisites for application of the res judicata exception are: (1) parties must be identical in both suits, or in privity; (2) prior judgment must have been rendered by the court of competent jurisdiction; (3) there must be final judgment on the merits; and (4) same claim or cause of action must be involved in both cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in a contest concerning the res judicata effect of a community property partition judgment, the res judicata effect, or the authority of the thing adjudged, takes place only with respect to what was the object of the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bruno v. Bruno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.