Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

821 So. 2d 374

Docket No. 1D00-4362.

Caldwell v. State

Craig CALDWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-07-09

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2006

4 state decisions

Relies on 745 So. 2d 1029 - Quigley v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Craig Caldwell, pro se, for Appellant.

¶2Louis Vargas, General Counsel; Anthony W. Garcia, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Craig Caldwell, a prisoner within the meaning of section 944.02(6), Florida Statutes (2000), challenges the denial of his petition to initiate rulemaking by the Department of Corrections. Because the department complied with section 120.54(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), by denying Caldwell's petition within 30 calendar days with written reasons, we affirm.

¶5We do not address the merits of Caldwell's claims on appeal. Because the Administrative Procedures Act does not apply to him, Caldwell is not entitled to appellate *375 review of the department's denial of his petition. See Quigley v. Dep't of Corrs.,745 So.2d 1029, 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). A prisoner's only avenue for judicial review is to seek declaratory or other relief in the circuit court. See id.

¶6AFFIRMED.

¶7ALLEN, C.J., BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

/821/so2d/374 · .json · Public domain