Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 So. 2d 417 - Giorgetti v. State

821 So. 2d 417 - Giorgetti v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Staples v. United States · Liparota v. United States · United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hese statutes create no mere informational reporting requirement, the violation of which is punished with a small fine.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Does Chicone [v. State, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla.1996) ] apply to the crime created by the sexual offender registration statutes and thus compel the court to presume a scienter or mens rea requirement even though the statutory text fails to contain an explicit requirement of such guilty knowledge?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he cases generally condemn any attempt to establish that defendant did not protest his arrest by declaiming his innocence in some way when he was being arrested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.