Richardson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Alabama v. Smith · Texas v. McCullough · 567 So. 2d 882 - Wemett v. State · 785 So. 2d 728 - St. Lawrence v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“independent legal basis or identifiable conduct”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Sands v. State · Parker v. State“when a different judge imposes a more severe sentence than the sentence imposed in the initial trial and the judge provides an `on-the-record, wholly logical, nonvindictive reason for the [harsher] sentence,' the Pearce presumption of vindictiveness does not apply”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`A trial court can legally restructure a defendant's sentences by changing concurrent terms to consecutive terms, as long as the new sentence is not found to be vindictive.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.