Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

821 So. 2d 453

Lopez v. Ideal Roofing Systems

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-07-19

Relies on 543 So. 2d 204 - De Ayala v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. · 686 So. 2d 724 - Hensley v. Punta Gorda

Decided 2002-07-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1The widow of Juan Lopez appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims which found that the monetary limits of section 440.16(7) apply to a claim for survivor’s benefits. We reverse.

¶2The claimant applied for death benefits in the amount of $100,000, the maximum allowed under section 440.16(l)(b). The employer/carrier sought to limit the total amount of claimant’s potential recovery to $50,000 in accordance with section 440.16(7), which imposes that limit on the claim of “aliens not residents (or about to become nonresidents) of the United States or Canada.” ' The widow is apparently a citizen and resident of Mexico. It was noted that an earlier version of the statute was held unconstitutional in DeAyala v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance, 543 So.2d 204 (Fla.1989). However, the 1987 Florida Legislature had amended the statute by increasing the amount payable to nonresident aliens, but still leaving that amount to be less than that payable to residents of the United States and Canada. The Judge of Compensation Claims noted that she did not have jurisdiction to declare a provision of the Florida Workers’ Compensation Act unconstitutional, Hensley v. Punta Gorda, 686 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and accordingly held for the employer/carrier on this issue.

¶3We reverse, finding that the monetary limitation of the current version of section 440.16(7) is unconstitutional in light' of the unambiguous holding of DeAyala. The cause is remanded for further proceedings t regarding the claim for survivor’s benefits.

¶4REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WOLF, KAHN and BENTON, JJ„ concur.
/821/so2d/453 · .json · Public domain