821 So. 2d 663 - Porter v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Arceneaux v. Domingue · Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. · 654 So. 2d 311 - Lewis v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEV.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Filing suit and getting a TRO to prevent the defendant [donor] from pursuing his livelihood. 2. Making threats to beat the defendant. 3. Taking the defendant’s track, briefcase and checkbook and refusing to return the checkbook as of the date of trial. 4. Accusing the defendant of theft and attempting to have him arrested. 5. Drawing a weapon on a person thought to be the defendant. 6. Intentionally running into a truck occupied by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Grievous injuries sufficient to revoke a donation have been defined as any act naturally offensive to the donor. The jurisprudence has held that cruel treatment or grievous injury sufficient to revoke a gratuitous donation may include adultery by a spouse, seizing property belonging to a parent, filing suit against a parent alleging criminal activity, and slandering the memory of the donor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.