Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 821 SO2D 673 - In re Forgione

In re Forgione’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 635 So. 2d 199 - Horton v. McCary · Buras v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension · Comm-Care Corp. v. LOUISIANA TAX COM'N · Conner v. Conner · 499 So. 2d 611 - State in Interest of JB

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court clearly has within its power the ability to sanction the agency or officials in the agency for such. failure. La. C.C.P. arts. 224 and 191.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “may yet sanction DHH for its misconduct regarding preparation of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.